More Returns Problems
We’ve had a report from Roger, who’s also had problems returning faulty products to eBuyer.
This time the product is a camera, and less than 6 months old. Just a reminder, warranty with retailers is always at least one year. So how are eBuyer getting away with this?
I would never use this company again. A few months back I bought a camera for my daughters’ birthday. She opened the box took a couple of snaps, and then put it away. A month or so later she took it out to use it again; on turning it on the LCD screen had failed. Since it’d had virtually no use, and been stored in its box I can only assume some underlying manufacturing defect.
eBuyer refused to take any responsibility despite the goods being less than 6 months old and refuse their responsibility under the Sale of Goods Act. They have pushed responsibility back on to me in contravention of the act. I don’t have time to mess about in the courts for such a small sum, especially as I work abroad a lot, this was my reason for using an internet site in the first place. Next time I will USE A REPUTABLE HIGH STREET NAME – it’s worth any difference in price.
Just to remind you, and eBuyer (I suspect Armando Sanchez himself reads this site, given some recent information);
“If goods are faulty and you wish to claim a full refund you should contact the trader within a reasonable period of time, this time period is not set out by the law as it will vary depending on what has been purchased and the circumstances of the sale.” – Sale of Goods Act
Obviously eBuyer don’t believe their cameras should last 6 months.
3 Comments to More Returns Problems
Warning!
Content is copyrighted to the author, we simply re-publish the content sent to us with permission. We take no responsibility for the comments or content on this site. This is all purely opinion. Do not use this information or any recommendations for any legal basis, and nothing here should be taken as fact.Join Us!
Pages
- Pages
Interesting site you have here. I’ve had a good read through. This post struck me as a bit odd though. Surely this camera, after 6 months, should be the responsibility of the manufacturer and should also be under warranty? Seems odd to expect the trader to deal with it in this case. Just my initial thoughts. I couldn’t see anything about a compulsary 12 month warranty from the trader in the Sale of Goods Act linked. I’d be very interested to know more if this is the case due to a recent purchase I made on EBay. Cheers.
I’m reading a book called Don’t Get Done – Get Dom, by Dominic Littlewood. This book highlights, your legal rights are covered by the Sale of Goods Act for up to 6 years. For the first six months, the seller should accept responsibility for any fault. However, past six months & for the next five & a half years, it’s up to you to prove that what’s gone wrong with your goods is a manufacturer’s fault & not a one off. Basically, you have to find evidence that your product has the same fault world wide or is a common fault locally i.e. Europe etc..
So, check the internet for evidence of faults with your model of Camera & supply this evidence to the seller, along with your complaint & within reason, what you expect them to do, maybe swap it for one that’s already been refurbished.
Well, I used to work for ebuyer, in tech support, the first people you speak to if you want to return a product. The only reason this would have been denied is if the magical screen fault was a dirty great smashed hole that suddenly appeared. Amazing how indignant some people would get.